建筑之艺术性:形式美+象征性
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

吴焕加,清华大学建筑学院教授,主要从事外国建筑史与建筑理论研究

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Architectural Art: Formal Beauty + the Symbolic
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    讨论何为形式美,形式美与建筑的关系。比较黑格尔、恩格斯等人的观点,认为建筑艺术是一种象征性艺术,形式与内容的关系多样复杂,不必统一。包括建筑在内的器物——非纯粹艺术品领域,根本问题是形式与功能。 建筑形式美受制于建筑自身必需的形制,且没有放之四海而皆准的建筑理论。人们长期的生活积淀、分类、规范形成了形式美法则。建筑形式美的根本原则为“多样统一” 及“和谐”。在现代化转型中,建筑审美出现“正常—反常—超常”的演变层次。现在的中国建筑受到本土外来双重因素影响,并将外来因素内化,形成具有跨文化特征的中国特色现代建筑。

    Abstract:

    The paper discusses what is formal beauty and the relationship between formal beauty and architecture. Comparing the viewpoints of Hegel and Engels, it is believed that architectural art is a kind of symbolic art, and the relationship between form and content is diverse and complex, so it is unnecessary to unify. The fundamental problem of non-pure art, including architecture, is its form and function. The formal beauty of the architectural is restricted by the necessary rules of architecture itself, and there is no universally applicable architectural theory. The accumulation, classification, and standardization of people’s long-term life have formed the rule of formal beauty. The fundamental principles of architectural form beauty are “diversity and unity” and “harmony”. In the process of modernization transformation, the phenomenon of evolution of “normal-abnormal-supernormal” appears in architectural aesthetics. The current Chinese architecture was born in both local and foreign factors, and has internalized the foreign factors to form a modern architecture with Chinese characteristics by way of this cross-culturalization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴焕加.建筑之艺术性:形式美+象征性[J].建筑史学刊,2022,(4):4-11.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-20